Death of the Book?
I’ve already written about this in the post about Richard Charkin’s talk (’The Future of Publishing in the Digital Age’), but I wanted to write a bit more about it. If you’ll indulge me.
There’s an article in last week’s Economist (I’m not the fastest of readers) about new technologies in publishing (’Unbound‘, Economist 7th June) which covers devices such as Amazon’s Kindle, already mentioned before.
Now, the Kindle is clearly not an object of desire. It’s not an iPhone, and it’s not the sort of thing that will MAKE people rush out to get one and switch medium from paper to electronic. It won’t be the sort of thing that you whip out proudly in public - if anything, firing up one of these will only make fellow readers harrumph and flick through their paperback noisily in defiance. It reminds you of the sort of early-80s Alan Sugar AMSTRAD computer brick which somehow managed to excite people sufficiently to help make Sugar the millionaire he now is.
But that doesn’t mean that the Kindle isn’t another early step in an interesting direction.
As a traditionalist in the audience countered in Richard Charkin’s talk, and as the standard argument goes, “yes, but you’ll never be able to beat holding a good old-fashioned paper book in your hand, whether you’re reading it on the train or in the bath”. Wrong. Not YET. But they will. The Kindle may not yet be that beautiful, but just think about what WILL become possible. Using only today’s imagination, future e-books will be far less cumbersome than what we have now, and will be able to use smart-links in the book’s text to either look up definitions online or in built-in dictionaries. Or make recommendations of other books in the margins. Maybe we won’t have the satisfaction of pulling out the bookmark from a page near the end of the book, showing everyone you’re almost finished (admit it - often, one of the nice things about the book is finishing it, whether it was a great book or not; it’s an accomplishment). But perhaps instead the e-book will have an hourglass; or a Google Map showing the progress the professor’s made in his chase around Europe to find the code; which cycle of hell Dante has reached (oh no - he’s surrounded by celebrities braying their life stories!); or an emoticon showing how close our heroine has come to achieving full atonement for her childhood crimes.
Maybe the e-book will have a soundtrack playing in the background, either the official film soundtrack, or preferably one of your choice. E-books will be able to pick up wi-fi updates (already entire books can be downloaded wirelessly via Amazon) so you could even pick up local histories or commentaries as you pass by. Suddenly you’ll be able to get a whole lot more out of the myriad ‘Untitled’ paintings in galleries if you can actually look up relevant articles by critics friendly or hostile.
And that’s just using today’s imagination. Who’d have thought only ten years ago that we’d be surfing the internet at high speed on our own mobile phones (”Internet? Mobile phone? Can’t imagine what for!”) In ten years’ time, it’s already hard to predict what consumer technology will be available - but take a look at this Youtube clip from Nokia from earlier this year.
It’s basically some high-tech back-of-the-envelope sketches of future mobile possibilities. Which, for me, makes the prospect of the potential of e-books very exciting indeed.
Am I willing the end of the paper book? No, of course not. I have nothing against it, it’s great for what it does, which is to get across the text of a book in a very simple way without any distractions. So why replace it? Well, why not? One very good reason would be the environment. Why should some retired bank manager in Dorset think that several hundred trees should suffer so the world can hear about his thrilling rise from middle-class to slightly-upper-middle class, via that car crash and the death of his mother and dog? Why should we rub out forests the size of Wales (or is it Luxembourg, I can never remember) just to recycle the same thriller plot from that flabby right-wing American author? If the book was purely in download format, then you’d buy the e-book once (or perhaps every year, with a contract, from the Blooms-Blackberry Corporation) then simply pay for downloads.
If the e-book weren’t a ‘walled garden’ product (eg AOL, which keeps the user corralled in an internet zone whose borders are decided by the ISP) you could also access the works of lesser writers, the ones who you won’t find in the front porch of Waterstones, the ones who don’t even have a book deal. OK, so many writers without a deal simply don’t have a good enough product, but equally, publishing budgets are limited and many great works never see the light of day because our current system only publicises a few hundred books a year. As with popular websites and viral campaigns, if the product is good, it will be seen, whether thanks to corporate marketing budgets, or more likely via wildfire email forwarding. Suddenly that retired bank manager, or that tragic guy born without a sense of perspective, can have their life story in download format available to all.
OK, so perhaps it’s not such a great idea after all…




This week, apart from the official start of the NGA festival which kicks off tomorrow, has already seen the start of the Online Narrative. In ten locations dotted around the city (not just the centre, which is nice) observant passers-by will find billboard prompts to take part in a two-week narrative by texting or emailing in story snippets.